Cambridge Housing Authority Case Study



With Excessive Duct Leakage Standing in the Way of LEED Certification for A New Public Housing Building, Aeroseal Succeeds where Multiple Attempts at Mastic Failed

To be LEED certified, the ductwork used to ventilate 40 bathrooms in the newly constructed five-story building had to demonstrate a total leakage rate below 250 CFM. With first test results showing 900+ CFM, it wasn’t even close. Not only were bragging rights to another energy-efficient building at stake, but so were thousands of dollars in federal rebate dollars that the Cambridge Housing Authority (CHA) planned on receiving through LEED certification.

The mechanical contractor sent in a team of sealers to find and fix the leaks using traditional mastic sealing methods. After several costly attempts at manually sealing the ductwork, leakage rates remained much too high to meet building goals. That’s when the CHA decided to take a chance on Aeroseal, a new approach to duct sealing that works from the inside of the ductwork to find and seal the leaks.

In Brief

Building: Cambridge Housing Authority construction
Location: Cambridge, MAScreen Shot 2015-10-26 at 12.08.26 PM
General Contractor: P.J. Dionne, Wilmington, MA
Aeroseal Contractors: Aspen Air Duct Cleaning, Methuen, MA
Goal: Meet LEED duct leakage rate of 250 CFM or less 
Before Aeroseal: Average 900+ CFM of leakage
After Aeroseal: Average 40 CFM of leakage Results: Reduced leakage by approximately 95%

On a Friday, the Aeroseal team at Aspen Air Duct Cleaning set up their equipment and prepared the ductwork for Aerosealing. The following Monday they began and finished the entire project. The mechanical contractors retested the ductwork and confirmed what the computerized Aeroseal system reported upon completion of the process – Aerosealing the ductwork brought leakage down to 47 CFM – well below the LEED certification requirements. This total included the leakage around the fire damper door access panels. When the inherent leaks around these panels were taken out of the equation, the loss was only 8 CFM for the entire system.

The entire process took two workdays to complete and was conducted while other construction work continued throughout the building. Any concerns over health risks were quickly eliminated after a review of the technology’s Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) by the union steward. He found that the sealant was completely non-toxic and entirely safe. The CHA was so pleased with the results that it is currently in discussions with Aspen regarding the possibility of future Aerosealing projects.


“I’m a 100% believer in the Aeroseal process. I wish we had had it specified for the job in the beginning.” — Don Stock, Project Manager, P.J. Dionne

“Initially, there was a lot of skepticism among the building engineers that Aeroseal would do the trick – especially when they learned that the sealant doesn’t coat the entire inside of the ductwork but instead, accumulates around the individual leaks. After seeing the results, they are all now believers and big fans of the technology.” — Bob Corsetti, Managing Director, Aspen Duct Cleaning

The Aeroseal Process: Duct Sealing From The Inside

Screen Shot 2015-10-26 at 12.08.34 PM







Aeroseal – The Technology

  • Developed at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in 1994.
  • Research for Aeroseal technology was partially funded by the U.S. Department of Energy.
  • Aeroseal is the only duct sealant technology that is applied from the inside of the duct system. It is delivered as a non-toxic aerosol mist that seeks out and plugs leaks.
  • Aeroseal has proven to be 95% effective at sealing air duct leaks.

For more information on this sealing project or about Aeroseal in general, contact Aspen Air Duct Cleaning at (978) 681-5023 or email



Case Study: Aeroseal Key to $37,000 Annual Energy Savings for New Jersey High-Rise





Energy Auditors Specify The Use Of Aeroseal To Increase Energy Efficiency And Reduce Duct Leakage by Up to 95% In 23-Story Apartment Building

Owners of Northgate II, a Section 8 community in Camden, New Jersey, were looking to reduce energy costs associated with its 308-unit apartment high-rise. To receive upgrade funding through the State’s Multifamily Weatherization Assistance Program, they had to prove that upgrades would result in substantial energy savings and a payback period of ten years or less. Energy auditors brought in to evaluate and recommend an effective course of action specified changes be made to the building’s electrical and mechanical systems. They also insisted that Aeroseal be used to seal leaks throughout the high-rise’s entire duct system.

In Brief

Property Managers: Fair Share Development
Project Contractors: McDonald Building Co.
Property Name: Northgate II
Type: Section 8, 23-story high-rise, 308 units
Goal: Reduce energy usage by 15% or more
Before Aeroseal: Average energy leakage: 971 CFM*
After Aeroseal: Average 83% reduction in CFM loss
Cost savings: $34,000/year from reduced exhaust fan usage. An additional $3,000/year from increased heating efficiency.
Payback: 3-4 years.
    *Cubic feet per minute

An initial audit of the 23-story high rise’s ductwork showed that there were thousands of leaks throughout the building’s exhaust system. As a result, the two large fans used to draw stale air out of each of the individual apartments consumed a lot of energy to do its job. By effectively sealing the leaks with Aeroseal and updating the system’s dampers, the fans’ energy use was reduced by more than 217,000 kw/hours – a savings of more than $34,000 a year in electricity. Building owners also achieved an additional $3,000 a year in savings through more effective heating.


“Preliminary testing revealed fairly large gaps throughout the building’s vertical exhaust ducts. The Aeroseal process fixed that problem and in doing so, significantly improved the efficiency of the building’s two exhaust fans. Aeroseal technology played a significant role in helping reduce energy consumption and ultimately meeting the requirements of the State’s Weatherization Assistance Program.”

John Ambrose, McDonald Building Company

“Our multi-family building specialists have a keen interest in ventilation systems and the wasted energy that often results from leaky ductwork. Through our ongoing experience with aeroseal technology we’ve come to including the Aeroseal process as a standard recommendation when leaky duct systems are a concern.”

Don Casper, energy auditor, Steven Winter Associates

Aeroseal – The Technology

  • Developed at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in 1994.
  • Research for Aeroseal was partially funded by the EPA and the U.S. Department of Energy.
  • Aeroseal is the only duct sealant technology that is applied from the inside of the duct system. It is delivered as a non-toxic aerosol mist that seeks out and plugs leaks.
  • Aeroseal has proven to be 95% effective at sealing air duct leaks.

Aeroseal – The Company

  • Aeroseal LLC is a subsidiary of JMD Corporation. The company is dedicated solely to the support of its dealers and the expansion of Aeroseal technology as a primary means of residential and commercial energy conservation.
  • Aeroseal is the sole owner and licensee of Aeroseal technology.

Aeroseal technology was bought by Carrier Corporation in the late 1990s. In 2010, Mark Modera, the inventor of Aeroseal, with the support of private equity investors, bought the company from carrier to realize the full potential and benefits of the technology. This lead to the launch of Aeroseal LLC in 2011.